[Clinical practice guidelines for hypertension 2003. Do they clarify or confuse?].
نویسنده
چکیده
In May 2003 the almost simultaneous publication of the Update on Clinical Practice Guidelines by The Spanish Society of Cardiology, an initial document of the VII Report of Joint National Committee (JNC), and the European Society of Cardiology and European Society of Hypertension Guidelines in another jointly issued document, created controversy. The points of disagreement basically concerned the classification of hypertension, the choice of treatment strategy on the basis of individual cardiovascular risk, and the choice of initial treatment. A detailed analysis of the three documents, however, reveals more points of concurrence than of actual disagreement. A category between normal blood pressure and established hypertension, classified as prehypertension in the VII JNC Report and as normal-high BP in the Spanish and European Society of Cardiology Guidelines, includes a population at high risk for developing hypertension and in which lifestyle modifications are needed. In some specific clinical situations, basically in vascular high-risk patients, there is broad consensus on the definition of therapeutic groups based on scientific evidence from large clinical trials. In patients not included in a group with a specific indication, any drug included in the 5 main therapeutic groups can be used as the first step in treatment; in this group of patients thiazide diuretics play a preponderant role. The main objective of hypertension treatment is to obtain maximal reduction in overall cardiovascular risk, which requires correction of all associated risk factors and appropriate treatment for target organs likely to be affected.
منابع مشابه
Ethnic specific recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: a first exploratory comparison between guidelines from the USA, Canada, the UK, and the Netherlands.
OBJECTIVES To investigate whether clinical practice guidelines in different countries take ethnic differences between patients into consideration and to assess the scientific foundation of such ethnic specific recommendations. DESIGN Analysis of the primary care sections of clinical practice guidelines. SETTING Primary care practice guidelines for type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and...
متن کاملGeneralizability of guidelines and physicians' adherence. Case study on the Sixth Joint National Commitee's guidelines on hypertension
BACKGROUND Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) are thought to be an effective tool in improving efficiency and outcomes of clinical practice. Physicians' adherence to guidelines is reported to be poor. We evaluated the relationship between generalizability of guidelines on hypertension and physicians' adherence to guidelines' recommendations for pharmacological treatment. METHODS We used the S...
متن کاملSummary of the 2007 European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension
Background The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) published their fi rst European-specifi c guidelines in 2003. The decision to publish their own recommendations recognized that their historical endorsement of the World Health Organization (WHO) and International Society of Hyperten...
متن کاملEvidence-based clinical practice guidelines: where's the evidence and what do I do with it?
One of the most ambitious, and arguably most important, projects of the American Association for Respiratory Care (AARC) has been the publication of peer-reviewed clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Since 1991, 51 CPGs have been published in RESPIRATORY CARE. These have become the backbone of respiratory therapist-directed protocols,1 and they have been reproduced in current respiratory care t...
متن کاملClinical Evidence: a useful tool for promoting evidence-based practice?
BACKGROUND Research has shown that many healthcare professionals have problems with guidelines as they would prefer to be given all relevant information relevant to decision-making rather than being told what they should do. This study assesses doctors' judgement of the validity, relevance, clarity and usability of the Italian translation of Clinical Evidence (CE) after its free distribution la...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Revista espanola de cardiologia
دوره 56 10 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003